A modified method for the epidemiological analysis of registry data on infants with multiple malformations.

BACKGROUND: Infants with multiple malformations are important in birth defect epidemiology and malformation monitoring because human teratogens have often caused complex malformations. Various methods for the analysis of multimalformed infants have been tried. METHOD: By using data from four large registries of congenital malformations, 5256 infants were identified with two or more among 73 selected malformations. Pairwise associations between malformations were detected by multiple logistic regression analyses, and putative confounders (programme, maternal age, autopsy, etc.) were controlled for. For each significant pairwise association, further analyses were performed in order to find associations with a possible third malformation. RESULTS: The importance of controlling for several confounders was demonstrated. Several well-known associations were found, which supports the technique used. The interpretation of three-way associations was discussed. Results from the present study were compared with those obtained using some other methods. CONCLUSIONS: Different confounders can cause biased associations. The method presented in the paper takes this into consideration and is therefore more likely than previously used techniques to give unbiased information on the clustering of different malformations among multimalformed infants.

Knowledge of likely time of ovulation and contraceptive use in unintended pregnancies.

This investigation analyzed social and demographic characteristics of women having an unwanted or mistimed pregnancy (unintended pregnancies at the current time) in South America. A sample of 5135 women having had a normal non-malformed live-born infant were interviewed immediately postpartum at 18 hospitals participating in the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (Spanish acronym: ECLAMC). Half (2568/5135 = 50%) reported that their pregnancies had been unintended, and, of those, 59.3% (1522/2568 = 59.3%) declared that they were trying to avoid conception. The latter group (n = 1522) was the main sample for this study. Patients were asked about their knowledge of when during the menstrual cycle conception is most likely to occur, their biomedical and social characteristics, the type of contraceptive methods used, their opinion of reasons for contraceptive failure, and their reasons for not using contraceptive methods. Among women with unintended pregnancies who attempted to avoid conception, only 61.6% were using contraceptive methods. Reasons given for not using contraceptives included health problems, lack of knowledge and lack of access to contraception. Women with unintended pregnancies who had not attempted to avoid conception were younger, often primigravid, less educated, and less knowledgeable concerning when during the cycle pregnancy is most likely to occur. Thus, reproductive health policies should be aimed at this target group.

PIP: This study analyzes the social and demographic characteristics of women having an unwanted or unintended pregnancy in South America between 1992 and 1994. The study was conducted among 5135 women who had a normal non-malformed live-born infant and were interviewed at 18 hospitals participating in the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations. Patients were asked about their knowledge of when conception is most likely to occur during the menstrual cycle, their biomedical and social characteristics, the type of contraceptive methods used, their opinion and reasons for contraceptive failure, and their reasons for failing to use contraceptive methods. Results indicate that 50% of the respondents had unintended pregnancies, and about 59% declared that they were trying to avoid conception. However, among women with unintended pregnancies who attempted to avoid conception, only 61.6% were using contraceptive methods. Reasons for failure to use contraceptives include health problems, lack of knowledge, and lack of access to contraception. Meanwhile, women with unintended pregnancies who had not attempted to avoid conception were younger, often primigravid, less educated, and less knowledgeable concerning the likelihood that pregnancy will occur during menstrual cycle. This study implies that reproductive health policies should be aimed at this target group.

Associated anomalies in individuals with polydactyly.

An epidemiological analysis of the association of polydactyly with other congenital anomalies was performed in 5,927 consecutively born polydactyly cases. They were grouped into three categories: duplicated fifth digit, duplicated first digit, and rare polydactylies; also into isolated or associated groups, if other birth defects were or were not observed in the same infant. Associated cases were further subdivided into: combined, if the other defect was a limb defect; syndromic, if a non-limb defect constituted a recognized causal or pathogenetic entity; and MCA, if a non-limb defect did not constitute a recognized entity. In 14.6% of the 5,927 polydactyly cases studied, polydactyly was not the only congenital anomaly. This associated proportion was minimal for postaxial (11.8%), intermediate for preaxial-I (20.0%), and maximal for rare polydactyly (54.9%). Duplication of the fifth toe plus syndactyly of fourth and fifth toes, as well as other syndactylies adjacent to the duplicated digit is the most frequent type. Syndactyly of fourth and fifth toes was also combined with a duplicated fifth finger, suggesting the existence of an arrested or amputated in utero sixth toe. Polydactylies are rarely associated with other congenital anomalies except in recognizable syndromes. When syndromes are excluded, most of the significant positive associations disappear. Trisomy 13, Meckel, and Down syndrome explained 255 of the 338 syndromic polydactyly cases. Down syndrome is strongly associated with first-digit duplication, and negatively associated with postaxial polydactyly. The latter could not be explained by maternal age differences among Black and non-Black case sub-sets.

Lack of evidence of a major gene acting on postaxial polydactyly in South America.

Data on polydactyly were obtained from two large samples: the Latin American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC), and from a migrant Northeastern Brazilian population of rural origin (Hospedaria). ECLAMC is a case-control clinical epidemiological program comprising 10,035 individuals distributed among 2,030 segregating nuclear families. Hospedaria data consisted of 6,586 examined individuals belonging to 1,040 nuclear families. Using complex segregation analysis methodology we found no evidence of two loci (a major gene and a modifier locus) acting on postaxial polydactyly in the present study. Very high heritability values (in a classical multifactorial model) of postaxial polydactyly were detected, for several sets of analyses in ECLAMC and in Hospedaria. For the whole ECLAMC sample there is a peculiar suggestion of a major recessive gene effect responsible for the trait; however, no comparison with a model involving transmission probabilities (tau) was possible in this highly heterogeneous sample. If the whole ECLAMC sample is divided in subsamples, according to Black admixture proportions, the same multifactorial picture emerges. Two different inheritance patterns were verified for hand (HP) and foot (FP) postaxial polydactyly: For HP there is evidence of a non-Mendelian transmission mechanism, while for FP the parental/sib transmission appears to be due only to multifactorial causes.

The frequency and spectrum of congenital anomalies in natural family planning users in South America: no increase in a case-control study. NFP-ECLAMC Group. Natural Family Planning. Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations.

Users of natural family planning (NFP) practice periodic abstinence, leading many to reason that such couples should show increased anomalies in offspring as a result of fertilization involving aging gametes. In an effort to complement our NFP cohort study, we currently conducted a case-control study in the same region (South America) in which the largest number of cases have been recruited for our cohort NFP study. During 1992-94, 5324 case-control pairs of mothers were interviewed during the immediate postpartum period in 18 maternity hospitals participating in the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations: ECLAMC (Spanish acronym for Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations). Natural family planning (NFP) usage was recorded in 6% of mothers in the ECLAMC sample studied (n = 10,648). Overall, no significant differences in frequency of NFP usage were observed between malformed cases (349/5324 = 6.6%) and normal controls (303/5324 = 5.7%) (chi 2 = 3.3; df = 1; p > 0.05). No significant differences in sex ratios were observed between children of NFP user and non-user mothers. Of special interest is the lack of association between NFP and Down syndrome, the sentinel phenotype for the hypothesis of delayed fertilization (aging gametes).

Hand and foot postaxial polydactyly: two different traits.

The aim of this work was to test whether postaxial hexadactyly had different clinical and epidemiological characteristics depending on hand or foot involvement. In the period 1967-1993, the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECLAMC) enrolled 1,582,289 births, and 2,271 cases with isolated (nonsyndromal) postaxial polydactyly (5th-digit hexadactyly). The prevalence was 14.3/10,000 births. Postaxial polydactyly (PP) of the hand (HPP) was the most frequent type (N:1,733; 76.3%; prevalence: 11.0/10,000), followed by foot PP (FPP=N:351; 15.5%; prevalence: 2.2), and hand and foot PP (BPP=N:187; 8.2%; prevalence: 1.2). Unlike HPP (55.0% bilateral; 77.2% left), FPP was less frequently bilateral (19.4%), with lower preference for the left side (55.5%). As expected, HPP was associated with African Black ethnicity, male sex, twinning, low maternal education, parental consanguinity, and there was frequent recurrence in 1st-degree relatives. Conversely, FPP was associated with Amerindian racial background, parental subfertility, and bleeding in the 1st trimester of pregnancy. BPP displayed the highest frequency of associated congenital defects (23.4%, vs HPP:6.6%, FPP: 15.4%). In its isolated form, BPP resembled HPP more than FPP with respect to left preference (90.9%), familial recurrence (11.0% of 1st degree relatives), and low maternal education. Although male sex preference and high frequency of twinning was observed in the 3 PP subtypes, statistical significance was present only in HPP. None of the 3 PP subtypes showed abnormal values for perinatal mortality, birth weight, length of gestation, parental ages, or parity. A logistic regression analysis showed Black race only to be associated with HPP, parental subfertility with FPP, parental consanguinity with BPP, and non-Black race with both FPP and BPP. The data presented here are the first indication that HPP and FPP are 2 different entities, with a larger genetic component in HPP than in FPP.

Epidemiological analysis of rare polydactylies.

This work includes all cases with extra digits (polydactyly) registered from a birth sample of over four million births aggregated from two comparable birth series: the Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations: ECLAMC (3,128,957 live and still births from the 1967 to 1993 period), and the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations: ECEMC (1,093,865 livebirths from April 1976 to September 1993, and 7,271 stillbirths from January 1980 to September 1993). All but 2 of 6,912 registered polydactyly cases fit well into one of the following 11 preestablished polydactyly types (observed number of cases in parentheses): Postaxial hexadactyly (5,345), Preaxial-I hexadactyly (1,018), Seven or more digits (57), synpolydactyly (15), crossed polydactyly (45), 1st digit triphalangism (33), 2nd digit duplication (39), 3rd digit duplication (18), 4th digit duplication (22), Haas polysyndactyly (3), and high degree of duplication (4). The birth prevalence rates observed in both series were similar except for postaxial polydactyly, which was more frequent in the ECLAMC (150.2/100,000) than in the ECEMC (67.4/100,000), as expected due to the higher African Black ethnic extraction of the South-American than of the Spanish populations. This similar frequency for the rare polydactylies (5.4 per 100,000 in South America and 5.7 in Spain), and for each one of the 9 categories, suggests that the values reported here are valid for most populations. The rare polydactylies are frequently syndromal: one third of them (77/236) were found in association with other congenital anomalies, 11.0% (26/236) in MCA cases and 21.6% (51/236) in recognized syndromes.

Epidemiology of congenital pigmented naevi: II. Risk factors.

Genetic and environmental risks factors were investigated in a sample of 989 non-malformed newborn infants with skin pigmented naevi (PN), and in 989 non-malformed non-PN, control babies. The samples were obtained from a population of 531,831 livebirths, from fifty-nine South-American maternity hospitals. No significant differences were observed between the PN and control groups for the following risk factors: sex, twinning, parental consanguinity, socioeconomic level, parental ages, birth order, fetal presentation, type of delivery, postnatal mortality, and first trimester of pregnancy histories for maternal chronic illnesses or immunizations, radiation exposure, drug intake, and vaginal bleeding. PN infants were associated with high frequencies of Black racial ancestry, positive prenatal history for maternal acute illnesses, and high mean values for length of gestation and birth weight. The observed association of PN with maternal acute illnesses could be a spurious one, due to partial dependence upon Black racial ancestry, and to maternal memory bias. The analysis of the intrauterine growth curves showed that PN infants have a low prematurity rate, and a high mean by the control newborn group. This observation suggest that congenital PN appear in the latest stages of intrauterine development. No evidence was obtained to allow us to consider congenital PN as true developmental anomalies.